My Account
Help
Dashboard
LiveText Docs
File Manager
Reviews
Tools
Form: CEOI Rubric #1
Print a Blank Form
Owner: JSU Administration <jsuadmin>
Owner's Email: dherring@jsu.edu
Dataset: CEOI Rubri #1 (current)
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
1
The lesson plan aligned the lesson objectives with the Alabama course of study.
*
Learning Outcome I - Educational Theory and Research
1
2
3
4
NO
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
2
The lesson plan reflected the needs, interests, and abilities of students.
*
Learning Outcome I - Educational Theory and Research
1
2
3
4
NO
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
3
The lesson plan outlined creative activities related to the purpose(s), objectives and skills/concepts to be mastered (e.g., cooperative learning, discussion, discovery, problem-based learning).
*
Learning Outcome I - Educational Theory and Research
1
2
3
4
NO
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
4
Outcome Score
*
Learning Outcome I - Educational Theory and Research
1
2
3
4
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
5
During the lesson the candidate established relationships among facts, concepts, principles, and/or skills.
*
Learning Outcome II - Content Pedagogy
1
2
3
4
NO
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
6
During the lesson the candidate was able to make connections across the curriculum with regard to main ideas, central themes, knowledge, and/or skills.
*
Learning Outcome II - Content Pedagogy
1
2
3
4
NO
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
7
During the lesson the candidate used the students' prior knowledge and experiences to introduce new subject-area related content.
*
Learning Outcome II - Content Pedagogy
1
2
3
4
NO
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
8
Outcome Score
*
Learning Outcome II - Content Pedagogy
1
2
3
4
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
9
During the lesson the candidate demonstrated the ability to work effectively with exceptional/special needs students by providing appropriate grade level modifications and/or adaptations.
*
Learning Outcome III - Diverse Learners
1
2
3
4
NO
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
10
During the lesson the candidate clarified the lesson (remediation, reinforcement, or enrichment), selected and used resources appropriate to student differences (ability, achievement, interests, learning styles).
*
Learning Outcome III - Diverse Learners
1
2
3
4
NO
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
11
Outcome Score
*
Learning Outcome III - Diverse Learners
1
2
3
4
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
12
During the lesson the candidate demonstrated the ability to orient the students to the lesson by giving clear directions and summarizations of knowledge and skills to be gained.
*
Learning Outcome IV - Teaching Strategies and Techniques
1
2
3
4
NO
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
13
During the lesson the candidate used creative activities such as cooperative learning, discussion, discovery, problem-based learning.
*
Learning Outcome IV - Teaching Strategies and Techniques
1
2
3
4
NO
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
14
During the lesson the candidate used various questioning techniques to develop critical thinking and problem solving skills.
*
Learning Outcome IV - Teaching Strategies and Techniques
1
2
3
4
NO
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
15
Outcome Score
*
Learning Outcome IV - Teaching Strategies and Techniques
1
2
3
4
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
16
During the lesson the candidate encouraged appropriate teacher-student interaction.
*
Learning Outcome V - Professionalism
1
2
3
4
NO
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
17
During the lesson the candidate displayed ethical and appropriate professional dispositions.
*
Learning Outcome V - Professionalism
1
2
3
4
NO
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
18
Outcome Score
*
Learning Outcome V - Professionalism
1
2
3
4
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
19
During the lesson the candidate attempted to motivate students by encouraging active participation, ensuring equitable participation, accepting student ideas, and engaging students in individual and cooperative learning activities.
*
Learning Outcome VI - Educational Environment
1
2
3
4
NO
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
20
During the lesson the candidate managed time, space, activities, and student behavior in order to maximize instructional time and minimize disruptions.
*
Learning Outcome VI - Educational Environment
1
2
3
4
NO
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
21
Outcome Score
*
Learning Outcome VI - Educational Environment
1
2
3
4
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
22
During the lesson the candidate modeled appropriate oral/written communications. (correct word pronunciation, appropriate vocabulary, fluent speech, and legible writing).
*
Learning Outcome VII - Communication and Technology
1
2
3
4
NO
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
23
During the lesson the candidate appropriately utilized technology, media, bulletin boards, models, and/or displays.
*
Learning Outcome VII - Communication and Technology
1
2
3
4
NO
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
24
Outcome Score
*
Learning Outcome VII - Communication and Technology
1
2
3
4
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
25
During the lesson the candidate allowed students to demonstrate their learning through informal assessments such as student demonstrations, response to higher order questioning, etc.
*
Learning Outcome VIII - Assessment
1
2
3
4
NO
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
26
During the lesson the candidate utilized the results of informal/formal assessments to support student learning through feedback and/or adjustments to instruction.
*
Learning Outcome VIII - Assessment
1
2
3
4
NO
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
27
Outcome Score
*
Learning Outcome VIII - Assessment
1
2
3
4
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
28
Semester/Year
*
Fall 2008
Spring 2009
Fall 2009
Spring 2010
Fall 2010
Spring 2011
Fall 2011
Spring 2012
Fall 2012
Spring 2013
Fall 2013
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
29
Date: MM/DD/YYYY
*
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
30
Observer
*
University Supervisor
Cooperating Teacher
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
31
Observer's Name - (Last Name, First Name)
*
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
32
Candidate's Name - (Last Name, First Name)
*
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
33
Major
*
BME
BY
CLE
CLS
ECE
ECK
ECP
EED
ELA
FCS
FH
GS
HLT
HY
MS
MUI
MUV
PE
SH
SS
TE
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
34
Student ID#
*
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
35
Evaluation
*
Practicum
Internship
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
36
Observation #
*
1
2
3
4
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
37
Subject/Grade Level
*