Form: CEOI Rubric #1

Owner: JSU Administration <jsuadmin>
Owner's Email: dherring@jsu.edu
Dataset: CEOI Rubri #1 (current)
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
1
The lesson plan aligned the lesson objectives with the Alabama course of study. *
Learning Outcome I - Educational Theory and Research
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
2
The lesson plan reflected the needs, interests, and abilities of students. *
Learning Outcome I - Educational Theory and Research
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
3
The lesson plan outlined creative activities related to the purpose(s), objectives and skills/concepts to be mastered (e.g., cooperative learning, discussion, discovery, problem-based learning). *
Learning Outcome I - Educational Theory and Research
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
4
Outcome Score *
Learning Outcome I - Educational Theory and Research
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
5
During the lesson the candidate established relationships among facts, concepts, principles, and/or skills. *
Learning Outcome II - Content Pedagogy
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
6
During the lesson the candidate was able to make connections across the curriculum with regard to main ideas, central themes, knowledge, and/or skills. *
Learning Outcome II - Content Pedagogy
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
7
During the lesson the candidate used the students' prior knowledge and experiences to introduce new subject-area related content. *
Learning Outcome II - Content Pedagogy
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
8
Outcome Score *
Learning Outcome II - Content Pedagogy
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
9
During the lesson the candidate demonstrated the ability to work effectively with exceptional/special needs students by providing appropriate grade level modifications and/or adaptations. *
Learning Outcome III - Diverse Learners
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
10
During the lesson the candidate clarified the lesson (remediation, reinforcement, or enrichment), selected and used resources appropriate to student differences (ability, achievement, interests, learning styles). *
Learning Outcome III - Diverse Learners
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
11
Outcome Score *
Learning Outcome III - Diverse Learners
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
12
During the lesson the candidate demonstrated the ability to orient the students to the lesson by giving clear directions and summarizations of knowledge and skills to be gained. *
Learning Outcome IV - Teaching Strategies and Techniques
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
13
During the lesson the candidate used creative activities such as cooperative learning, discussion, discovery, problem-based learning. *
Learning Outcome IV - Teaching Strategies and Techniques
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
14
During the lesson the candidate used various questioning techniques to develop critical thinking and problem solving skills. *
Learning Outcome IV - Teaching Strategies and Techniques
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
15
Outcome Score *
Learning Outcome IV - Teaching Strategies and Techniques
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
16
During the lesson the candidate encouraged appropriate teacher-student interaction. *
Learning Outcome V - Professionalism
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
17
During the lesson the candidate displayed ethical and appropriate professional dispositions. *
Learning Outcome V - Professionalism
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
18
Outcome Score *
Learning Outcome V - Professionalism
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
19
During the lesson the candidate attempted to motivate students by encouraging active participation, ensuring equitable participation, accepting student ideas, and engaging students in individual and cooperative learning activities. *
Learning Outcome VI - Educational Environment
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
20
During the lesson the candidate managed time, space, activities, and student behavior in order to maximize instructional time and minimize disruptions. *
Learning Outcome VI - Educational Environment
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
21
Outcome Score *
Learning Outcome VI - Educational Environment
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
22
During the lesson the candidate modeled appropriate oral/written communications. (correct word pronunciation, appropriate vocabulary, fluent speech, and legible writing). *
Learning Outcome VII - Communication and Technology
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
23
During the lesson the candidate appropriately utilized technology, media, bulletin boards, models, and/or displays. *
Learning Outcome VII - Communication and Technology
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
24
Outcome Score *
Learning Outcome VII - Communication and Technology
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
25
During the lesson the candidate allowed students to demonstrate their learning through informal assessments such as student demonstrations, response to higher order questioning, etc. *
Learning Outcome VIII - Assessment
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
26
During the lesson the candidate utilized the results of informal/formal assessments to support student learning through feedback and/or adjustments to instruction. *
Learning Outcome VIII - Assessment
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional NO=Not Observed
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
27
Outcome Score *
Learning Outcome VIII - Assessment
Rating Scale 1=Unacceptable 2=Basic 3=Proficient 4=Exceptional
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
28
Semester/Year *
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
29
Date: MM/DD/YYYY *
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
30
Observer *
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
31
Observer's Name - (Last Name, First Name) *
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
32
Candidate's Name - (Last Name, First Name) *
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
33
Major *
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
34
Student ID# *
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
35
Evaluation *
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
36
Observation # *
EDIT: Y, VIEW: N, REQR: Y
37
Subject/Grade Level *